Application Modernization AWS

Move legacy apps forward. Monolith to containers, sensibly.

Application modernization on AWS without the big-bang rewrite. We take legacy applications off end-of-life runtimes and hand-managed servers, containerise them on ECS, and move self-managed databases onto RDS and Aurora — assessment first, one workload at a time, with a rollback point before any traffic shifts. AWS Advanced Tier Partner, founder-led on every engagement.

AWS Advanced Tier Partner
ISO 27001:2022 Certified
ISO 9001:2015 Certified
HAZERCLOUD · MODERNIZEAssessment-First

The modernization stack we ship on.

ECS FargateContainers
ECS on EC2Savings Plans
Aurora / RDSManaged data
Blue-GreenZero downtime
GitHub ActionsOIDC CI/CD
StranglerIncremental
AWS MAPWhere eligible
CloudWatchObservability
9
Applications modernised off Heroku onto AWS, zero production outages
Heroku case study
60%
Lower running cost after that PaaS-to-AWS modernization
Migration playbook
20–35%
AWS cost reduction from an ECS-based environment redesign
Cost case study
0
Downtime moving an over-provisioned database via blue-green
Windows case study
200+
Stale container images cleaned up across a multi-region estate
Cleanup case study
Why Modernize Now

The four things that force the conversation.

Legacy application modernization is rarely about fashion. In practice, engagements start because one of these four pressures has become urgent — and usually more than one at once.

01 · SECURITY

End-of-life runtimes and OS

Unsupported language runtimes, container base images, and operating systems stop getting security patches. That turns a working application into an audit finding and a breach risk overnight. Replatforming onto supported, patched images and keeping database engines on AWS-maintained versions closes the gap — and makes the next upgrade routine instead of a fire drill.

EOL RuntimesBase ImagesOS SupportPatch Cadence
02 · COMPLIANCE

Auditors want evidence

ISO 27001, SOC 2, and sector regimes expect least-privilege access, secrets kept out of environment variables, change control, and logging you can prove. Legacy stacks rarely produce that evidence cleanly. Modernizing onto managed AWS services — IAM roles per service, Secrets Manager, CloudWatch, audited CI/CD — builds the paper trail into the architecture. We hold ISO 27001:2022 ourselves, so we build to the standard we operate under.

ISO 27001SOC 2IAMSecrets Manager
03 · COST

The bill outgrew the value

Always-on servers, over-provisioned databases, and idle capacity quietly inflate the monthly spend. Modernizing lets you schedule non-production compute, right-size the data layer, and use container platforms that scale to real demand. On a Windows engagement we scheduled EC2 with Lambda and EventBridge and right-sized RDS — cost down, zero downtime. Deeper cost work runs under our AWS cost optimization practice.

Right-SizingSchedulingSavings PlansFargate Spot
04 · VELOCITY

Shipping got slow and scary

When every release is a manual, high-stakes event, the business stops shipping. Containerising the application and rebuilding CI/CD for automated, one-command deploys with rollback turns releases into a non-event. Teams move faster and sleep better. This is where a monolith to microservices on AWS conversation genuinely earns its complexity — but only where a real seam exists.

CI/CDBlue-GreenRollbackObservability
The AWS 7 Rs

Every workload gets a strategy. Not every strategy is ours to sell.

AWS frames modernization as seven paths — the 7 Rs. In the assessment we tag each application with one. Here is the honest split: three we deliver hands-on, and four where our job is to advise, not to invoice a rebuild you do not need.

Where HAZERCLOUD delivers

Rehost, Replatform, Refactor

  • Rehost (lift-and-shift). Move the workload onto AWS with minimal change — the fastest way to leave dying infrastructure and a common first step before deeper work.
  • Replatform (lift-and-reshape). Our most common play: containerise onto ECS, put the database on RDS or Aurora, keep the app largely intact but swap fragile pieces for managed services.
  • Refactor (re-architect). Change the code and structure where there is a real reason — carving a monolith to microservices on AWS one bounded seam at a time, never all at once.
Where we advise, then step back

Retire, Retain, Repurchase, Relocate

  • Retire. Some applications should simply be switched off. If the assessment finds one nobody uses, we will tell you to delete it, not modernise it.
  • Retain. Sometimes the right answer is “leave it alone for now.” If a workload is stable, compliant, and cheap, we will not manufacture a project.
  • Repurchase. Moving to a SaaS product can beat rebuilding. We will name the trade-off honestly even when it means less work for us.
  • Relocate. Container or VMware moves that shift a platform wholesale — useful in specific cases, but not where most of our value lies.
Our honest position: most legacy apps modernise best via replatform to containers, with selective refactoring where a seam and a payoff both exist. We will tell you when the right R is Retire or Retain — a rewrite nobody needed is the most expensive outcome of all.
Start Here

A scoped modernization assessment, first.

We never quote a rebuild blind. The first engagement is a fixed-scope assessment: we inventory the applications, tag each against the 7 Rs, surface the end-of-life and compliance risks, baseline the cost, and hand you a prioritised, sequenced plan you own — whether or not you continue with us.

It is deliberately small and deliberately honest. If the finding is that two apps should be retired and one left alone, that is what the report says. The plan is what turns “we should modernise” into a costed, phased roadmap with a clear first workload.

Scope your assessment →
  • Application inventory: every workload catalogued with its runtime, data layer, dependencies, and current hosting.
  • 7 Rs tagging: a recommended strategy per application — rehost, replatform, refactor, or honestly, retire or retain.
  • EOL and risk map: unsupported runtimes, base images, and OS versions ranked by security and audit exposure.
  • Cost baseline: where the current spend goes and where modernization can cut it, tied to real levers.
  • MAP eligibility check: whether the workloads may qualify for AWS Migration Acceleration Program funding.
  • Sequenced roadmap: a phased plan with a recommended first workload, a parallel-run approach, and rollback points.
Monolith → Containers

The path from monolith to containers, without the drama.

A repeatable, low-risk route we have run in production: containerise first, extract services only where they earn it. It all runs on our ECS and containerization practices, under the wider AWS migration service.

Step 1 · Containerise

Wrap the monolith as-is

Before anything is split, the existing application gets a Dockerfile, a task definition, and a home on ECS behind a load balancer. The monolith in a container is a legitimate destination — it removes host management, standardises deploys, and buys you a stable base to change from.

ECS-first · no rewrite required to get moving
Containerization service
Step 2 · Automate

Rebuild the deployment pipeline

CI/CD is rebuilt for container deploys: GitHub Actions with OIDC federation into AWS (no long-lived keys), image builds to ECR with lifecycle policies, and rolling or blue-green rollouts with one-command rollback. Releases stop being high-stakes events and start being routine.

GitHub Actions · OIDC · blue-green rollout
See the ECS practice
Step 3 · Strangle

Extract services where they earn it

Only now do we consider the strangler pattern: peel one bounded capability off the monolith at a time, run it as its own ECS service behind the same load balancer, prove it in production, then continue. Services get created for real seams and real reasons — never for a diagram.

Incremental · one seam at a time, parallel run
AWS migration service
Data Layer

Self-managed databases onto RDS and Aurora.

The database is almost always the critical path in a modernization. We move self-managed engines onto managed AWS services, right-size them to real demand, and cut over without downtime — snapshots taken before every change.

A · MANAGED

Self-managed DB → RDS

Databases running on hand-patched EC2 instances or on-prem servers move onto Amazon RDS: automated backups, Multi-AZ failover, managed patching, and engine versions AWS keeps current. That removes an entire category of undifferentiated maintenance and closes EOL exposure on the data tier.

RDSMulti-AZAutomated BackupsManaged Patching
B · SCALE

Higher demand → Aurora

Where throughput, read scaling, or resilience justify it, we move to Amazon Aurora — MySQL- and PostgreSQL-compatible, with storage that scales automatically and fast replica-based failover. It is the step up from RDS for workloads that have outgrown a single-instance database but do not need a rewrite to get there.

AuroraRead ReplicasAuto StorageFast Failover
C · CUTOVER

Zero-downtime blue-green

The cutover technique that keeps you online: a synchronised green copy runs beside the live blue database, we validate it, then switch with a short, controlled flip. On a Windows workloads engagement we right-sized an over-provisioned database to a db.t4g.medium instance with reduced storage this way — zero downtime, zero data loss.

Blue-GreenSnapshotsValidationRollback
D · RIGHT-SIZE

Over-provisioned → fit-for-purpose

Modernization is a chance to stop paying for a database sized for a peak that never comes. We match instance class and storage to the real workload — one engagement consolidated and migrated databases as part of an ECS redesign that cut AWS cost 20–35% without slowing the team down.

Right-SizingConsolidationCloudWatchCost Modelling
Windows Workloads

Modernizing Windows workloads pragmatically.

Windows and .NET workloads do not always need a rewrite to move forward. Often the fastest, safest wins are operational — schedule what runs, right-size what stores — before any containerisation of the application layer.

Windows · Cost

Scheduled Windows EC2, right-sized RDS

For a US HR company running Windows workloads on AWS, we cut cost by scheduling EC2 instances with AWS Lambda and Amazon EventBridge so servers ran only during business hours, and right-sized the RDS database via blue-green deployment — zero downtime, zero data loss.

0
Downtime
db.t4g
Right-sized DB
Read case study
Approach · Sequence

Operational wins first, containers next

The pragmatic order for Windows: automate start/stop and right-size the data layer to stop the bleeding immediately, keep IAM least-privilege and snapshots as the safety net, then containerise the .NET application onto ECS when the roadmap justifies deeper modernization.

Lambda
+ EventBridge
→ ECS
When it earns it
Containers on ECS
Governance · Safety

Change control that survives an audit

Every change on that engagement was backed by pre-migration snapshots, least-privilege IAM roles, and CloudWatch monitoring to confirm stable performance afterward. Modernization work slots straight into the evidence trail an ISO 27001 or SOC 2 audit expects.

IAM
Least-privilege
Snapshots
Rollback safety
Cost optimization
AWS MAP Funding

Modernization AWS may help pay for.

The AWS Migration Acceleration Program (MAP) is a real program that can offset part of the cost of qualifying migration and modernization projects. Here is the honest version of how it works and where we fit.

What MAP can do

Funding for qualifying projects

  • Offsets project cost. MAP can provide AWS funding toward assessment and migration work for workloads that qualify, reducing the net cost of modernizing.
  • Structured methodology. The program follows an assess / mobilise / migrate-and-modernise approach that lines up cleanly with how we already sequence engagements.
  • Partner-supported. As an AWS Advanced Tier Services Partner, we can help package the engagement, run the assessment AWS expects, and document the workloads.
What we will not overstate

Eligibility is AWS's call

  • AWS decides. Eligibility, funding levels, and approval are determined by AWS against their own criteria — not something any partner can promise up front.
  • Workload-dependent. Qualification depends on the size and type of the workload, so it is checked per estate, not assumed.
  • Assessed honestly. We flag MAP eligibility as part of the modernization assessment, so you know early whether it is worth pursuing.
The practical takeaway: if your workloads qualify, MAP can meaningfully reduce the cost of modernizing — and we will check eligibility in the assessment. We help you pursue it; AWS decides the outcome.
Common Questions

What buyers ask before a modernization engagement.

Don't see your question? Book a 30-minute review and ask the founder directly.

Book a call →
What is application modernization on AWS, and where do you start?+
Application modernization on AWS means moving legacy software off ageing infrastructure and runtimes onto managed AWS services — usually containers on ECS, managed databases on RDS or Aurora, and automated CI/CD — so it costs less to run and is faster to change. We always start with a scoped assessment, not a rebuild. We map your applications against the AWS 7 Rs framework, identify the end-of-life risks and the biggest cost drains, and hand you a prioritised plan. Nothing gets containerised or migrated until that plan is agreed.
Do we have to break the monolith into microservices?+
No — and pushing every client toward microservices would be dishonest. For most teams the right first move in monolith to microservices on AWS is to containerise the monolith as-is (rehost or replatform), get it onto ECS with automated deployments, and only then carve out services where a real seam and a real reason exist. We use the strangler pattern: extract one bounded capability at a time behind the same load balancer, prove it in production, then continue. A distributed system you do not need is more expensive and more fragile than the monolith it replaced.
Our runtime or operating system is going end-of-life. Can you help?+
Yes — EOL runtimes are one of the most common triggers for legacy application modernization. Unsupported language runtimes, container base images, and operating systems stop receiving security patches, which becomes a compliance and audit problem fast. We replatform onto supported, patched images, move self-managed databases onto RDS or Aurora engine versions that AWS keeps current, and rebuild the pipeline so future upgrades are routine rather than a fire drill. We scope the EOL exposure in the assessment so you can prioritise by risk, not guesswork.
Can AWS MAP funding cover part of the work?+
The AWS Migration Acceleration Program (MAP) can offset part of the cost of qualifying migration and modernization projects, and as an AWS Advanced Tier Services Partner we can help you assess whether your workload is eligible and package the engagement accordingly. Eligibility, funding levels, and approval are determined by AWS — we do not promise a figure we do not control. What we can do is run the assessment AWS expects, document the workloads, and structure the modernization so it fits the program if you qualify.
How do you modernize the database without downtime?+
We move self-managed databases onto Amazon RDS or Aurora and right-size them to the actual workload. The critical-path technique is a blue-green deployment: a synchronised green copy runs alongside the live blue database, we validate it, then cut over with a short, controlled switch. On a recent Windows workloads engagement we right-sized an over-provisioned database to a db.t4g.medium instance with reduced storage using exactly this method, with zero downtime and zero data loss. Snapshots are taken before every change as a rollback safety net.
We run Windows workloads — is modernization worth it?+
Often the fastest wins on Windows are operational rather than a full rewrite. For a US HR company running Windows workloads on AWS, we cut cost by scheduling EC2 instances with AWS Lambda and Amazon EventBridge so servers ran only during business hours, and right-sized the RDS database via blue-green deployment — all with zero downtime. That is documented in our Windows workloads cost optimization case study. From there, containerising the .NET application layer onto ECS is a natural next step when the roadmap justifies it.
How long does a modernization engagement take, and what does it cost?+
It depends on the number of applications and how much the data layer needs to move, which is why we scope with an assessment first rather than quoting blind. As a real reference point: we migrated nine applications off Heroku onto AWS ECS in roughly six weeks with zero production outages and up to 60% lower running cost. Modernization is phased — assessment, then one workload at a time with a parallel run and rollback point before any traffic shifts — so you see value early and never bet the business on a big-bang cutover.
MODERNIZE
Staring at a legacy stack you cannot keep running?

30 minutes with our founder. One specific modernization recommendation guaranteed.

Whether it's an end-of-life runtime, a database you cannot patch, a monolith that has become slow to ship, or a bill that keeps climbing — start with a free modernization review directly with the founder. You leave with at least one concrete next step, whether or not you engage us.

AWS Advanced Tier Services Partner · ISO 27001:2022 · Assessment-First, Founder-Led

30 min Free Consultation →